Chairman Bruce Bucher convened the April 2, 2003 meeting of the Board of Supervisors at 7:00 p.m. Present were Supervisors Bruce Bucher, W. Logan Myers, Roger Moyer, Michael Vigunas, and Joseph McSparran. In attendance were Township Manager Daniel Zimmerman, Joel Snyder, Michael Glass, Kevin Varner, H. Robert Miller, L. Scott Paden, Mark Leister, Chris Venarchick, Ken Notturno, Tim Eberly and David M. Pusey. Laura Knowles of Lancaster Newspapers represented the press.

GUEST RECOGNITION: H. Robert Miller, 1203 E. Newport Road, and Mark Leister, 1201 E. Newport Road, are present this evening regarding the Newport Square public hearing that is part of this evening’s agenda. Miller explained that the residents currently living in this area are concerned over the proposal to change the plan from 5 residential units to 30 units. He explained that the residents are concerned over the increase in traffic that would be caused by the proposal. Miller expressed the opinion that the potential exists for 45 additional vehicles along East Newport Road as part of the project, which would affect safety and noise in this area.

Leister explained that he is concerned over the excessive speed of motorists traveling along the roadway. The Chairman explained that the speed limit along the roadway has not changed, and added that enforcement of the speed limit is separate from the zoning issue.

The Chairman stated that if Miller’s and Leister’s concerns are about the Newport Square proposal, then the hearing should be commenced, and their comments can be made part of the record for the hearing. Leister requested that the speed limit along East Newport Road be lowered to 35MPH and "No Passing" signs be posted. The Chairman explained that a speed study would need to be conducted in order to determine the appropriate speed limit for the roadway. He noted that Leister’s request will be forwarded to the Police Department. The Township Manager outlined how speed studies are conducted.

PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONS APPLICATION RECEIVED FROM NEWPORT SQUARE ASSOCIATES. THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO MODIFY CONDITIONS PREVIOUSLY IMPOSED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS UPON THE GRANTING OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO NEWPORT SQUARE ASSOCIATES ON APRIL 21, 1999 TO DEVELOP A 72.52 ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST NEWPORT ROAD. THE APPLICANT SEEKS TO MODIFY THE LISTED CONDITIONS TO FURTHER SUBDIVIDE LOTS 147-151 FROM 5 SINGLE UNITS TO 10 FEE SIMPLE TOWNHOUSE LOTS, ADD 1430 SQ. FEET EXPANSION TO THE EXISTING BARN ON LOT 173 AND CONSTRUCT 20 RENTAL TOWNHOUSES.

The Chairman outlined the procedures to be followed for this evening’s public hearing. The Township Manager was sworn in. He provided a brief background of the Newport Square development project. He explained that the property was zoned R-2 when the project was originally submitted in 1997. He stated that the Board of Supervisors approved a Conditional Use application to develop the property under the Village Overlay guidelines of the Zoning Ordinance. The Village Overlay concept provides for mixed housing types (single-family, duplexes, townhouses, etc.) and commercial uses within a specific project area. The Township Manager confirmed the posting and proof of advertising for this evening’s hearing. He stated that the Warwick Township Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at their December 19, 2002 meeting and also at their January 22, and February 26, 2003 meetings. He added that he will provide a report of their findings into the record after the applicant has presented their case.

Joel Snyder and Chris Venarchick of RGS Associates, Michael Glass of Newport Square Associates, David Pusey of Pusey and Raffensperger, and L. Scott Paden of Paden de la Fuente were sworn in. Snyder provided copies of several renderings of the project to the Board members. He indicated the location of the proposed modifications for the benefit of the Board.

Snyder stated that the plan proposes to modify five single-family lots along Balmer Road and create 10 townhouse lots. He added that the other lots in this area are also townhouse lots. He explained that the lots would be accessed to the rear via a private alley and added that the alley would be accessed through a private parking lot behind the commercial area. Snyder explained that the plan also proposes a modification to lot 173. He explained that this area was approved with two commercial buildings; a 4,000 sq. ft. building facing North Oak Street and a 12,000 sq. ft. commercial building with 12 apartments on the second floor. The plan that is part of this evening’s hearing proposes to eliminate these commercial buildings and create 20 condominium townhouses under separate ownership and maintenance from the rental community. He noted that the net gain of the proposed modifications is 13 residential units. He stated that condition 18 would need to be modified to increase the density of the plan from 5.6 to 5.7 units per acre. Snyder stated that the plan also proposes a 1,430 sq. ft. expansion to the existing barn to accommodate its use as a restaurant (the expansion would be used to create a kitchen). He provided sketches of the proposed barn/restaurant for the benefit of the Board. He stated that the plan would provide a right-in access to this area of the site. Snyder explained that the commercial area would be reduced to 5% of the overall area of the site. He stated that several discussions with Township staff focused on the marketing study for the approved commercial area. He explained that as the project is proceeding, they are not finding a strong market for the commercial area and added that there is a strong market for the residential portion of the project. He noted that the modifications would assist in completing the project, which includes the final improvements to the intersection of North Oak Street and East Newport Road. Snyder added that the original decision required that the traffic impact of the development be re-evaluated upon the issuance of 200 certificates of occupancy.

Myers inquired who would maintain the private alley that would access the proposed townhouse units along Balmer Road. Snyder stated that the issue can be addressed during the land development phase of the project, and added that the access agreement could stipulate a maintenance requirement. Moyer inquired why the developer is proposing the creation of townhouse lots rather than the approved single-family lots. Snyder stated that the other single-family lots within project have an open space area separating them from the townhouse units. The single-family lots in this area are located adjacent to townhouse lots and the marketability of the lots is reduced. Snyder added that townhouse lots in this area are selling well and noted that several of the townhouse lots were sold as part of LHOP.

Attorney Notturno, representing the applicant, suggested that the shared access agreement designate that the owner of the two commercial buildings that would have jurisdiction over maintenance of the parking area, also maintain the private alley and invoice the allocated maintenance costs to the residential units. He noted that the access agreement would be submitted to the Township Solicitor for approval.

Snyder stated that although the plan would increase the density of the plan by 13 residential units, it also proposes to reduce the commercial area by 16,000 sq. ft. He expressed the opinion that traffic figures for the re-evaluated traffic study would remain unchanged, or be reduced, as a result of the proposed modifications. He explained that the plan would retain 6,800 sq. ft. of commercial space with second-floor apartments, the 3,000 sq. ft. convenience store, and the 4,000 sq. ft. barn (without the proposed addition) which would be remodeled into a restaurant.

Moyer inquired what type of marketing was performed for the approved commercial area. Glass stated that when the proposal was originally presented, the commercial area was proposed in the middle of the development since it was anticipated that the housing within the development would support the commercial area. He noted that ultimately, the commercial area was relocated to East Newport Road and everyone agreed that the development was a "textbook" livable community concept. He explained that studies indicate that there will not be sufficient housing within the development to create a market for the commercial area and expressed the opinion that the entire commercial area within the development could be eliminated since Lititz Borough is in the process of improving the viability of downtown Main Street from a retail standpoint. He added that adequate commercial uses exist along SR501 to serve this area. He explained that the market study that was performed for the original project calculated the apartment rent and the commercial rent that could be obtained for the project; however, since the commercial area has been on the market, they have not had an offer to purchase the retail area. Glass explained that the firm they hired to market the retail area contacted local and regional retail developers, and local and regional convenience store operators to gauge their interest in purchasing the property and they were not interested in this tract. Glass stated that he then decided to construct the retail area himself and hired an architect to design the structure. He explained that they proceeded to try to rent the commercial area and added that a dentist did express an interest in purchasing one of the buildings. Subsequently, the hospital and medical office units were proposed and the individual indicated that he no longer wanted an office located along East Newport Road.

Glass stated that his original plan to modify the development was to eliminate all of the commercial area and create townhouse units; however, based on discussions with the Warwick Township Planning Commission, he agreed to maintain a portion of the commercial area, and re-evaluate potential commercial uses when the apartment units are completed. Attorney Notturno clarified that the plan being presented this evening proposes to maintain the commercial area on the east side of North Oak Street.

Vigunas concurred with the applicant’s comments that a small convenience store operator might not be interested in this location since larger convenience stores are located in close proximity to the site. He added that he would be agreeable to modifying the use of the commercial building from a convenience store that would be dependent upon gasoline sales, to a use that could be supported by the local community. Glass indicated that would be his intent in re-evaluating the commercial area. Attorney Notturno stated that the developer would like to proceed with the restaurant and proposed residential uses on the west side of North Oak Street, and delay any modifications to the commercial area on the east side of North Oak Street until these other improvements are completed. Moyer inquired how the trips per day are affected by the proposed modifications. Snyder stated that the proposed 13 additional residential lots could generate approximately 5 trips per day, equating to 65 additional trips per day; he added that although he did not calculate the amount of traffic that would be reduced by eliminating the 16,000 sq. ft. of commercial space, he anticipates that the amount of traffic that would be reduced is well above 65 trips per day.

Bucher inquired how the developer determined that 10 townhouse lots should replace the approved 5 single-family lots. Pusey stated that there is not sufficient parking along Balmer Road for the units and added that he prefers the alley concept rather than providing for parking at the front of the units. He added that it is not economically viable to only create 8 townhouse lots since the existing infrastructure will have to be retrofitted. Pusey stated that he served on the Warwick Township Planning Commission when the project was originally submitted and he could not understand why the original partner on the project wanted a convenience store since it is not economically viable. He explained that he did not feel it was his job as a member of the Planning Commission to tell a landowner what to do with their property. He added that the economy may change in three years which might support the commercial area. He noted that the hospital and medical offices were not proposed when the project was originally submitted which affected the commercial area that was proposed as part of the development.

The Chairman inquired whether or not anyone wishes to comment on the modification of the single-family lots to townhouse lots. Vigunas stated that since the maintenance of the alley is coordinated with the parking lot for the commercial area, who would maintain the private alley. Glass testified that no matter how the area is ultimately developed, all future plans will address the maintenance of the alley. Snyder added that future plans could also propose a public alley, if feasible.

The Chairman inquired whether or not the condominiums (which are proposed to replace the 16,000 sq. ft. commercial area) would be rental units. Glass explained that he has not yet determined whether or not the condominiums would be offered for sale or for rent. He stated that if the units are offered for sale, they would be sold as condominiums, and if they are offered for rent they would be under common ownership. He noted that if the units are offered for rent, they would be similar to the units offered for rent in the "Highlands at Warwick" community; however, these units would be larger.

Snyder explained that the proposal would require the modification of 4 conditions contained within the original Conditional Use decision for Newport Square. Snyder stated that Condition 4 would need to be modified since the original plan required a vehicular barrier along Newport Road to protect the existing home along the roadway. Snyder explained that the barrier would no longer be needed since the plan proposes to relocate the building behind the building setback line and curbing would be extended into this area which would provide a barrier. Snyder stated that the wording of Condition 13 would need to be modified to allow the revised plan in accordance with the original Conditional Use plan. Condition 18 would need to be modified to allow the proposed density of 5.7 dwelling units per acre rather than originally approved 5.6 units per acre. This condition also placed a restriction on the maximum number of units at 400 and the plan now proposes 413 total dwelling units. Snyder explained that Condition 27 would need to be amended to address the potential changes in traffic volumes as a result of the proposed additional 13 dwelling units and the need for the applicant to construct or complete any improvements deemed necessary as part of addressing any traffic impacts. Snyder explained that the original decision indicated that the traffic impact should be considered upon the issuance of 200 certificates of occupancy. Glass noted that he would be agreeable to contributing toward a speed study being conducted along East Newport Road.

Bucher inquired whether or not anyone has any comments regarding the proposed 1,430 sq. ft. expansion to the existing barn to accommodate its use as a restaurant. McSparran inquired what is the viability of the restaurant at this time. Paden stated that he is the architect for the restaurant and would also be a partner in the restaurant, so the restaurant is very viable at this time.

Vigunas inquired why the developer was unable to provide the originally agreed upon number of 6 townhouse units to be sold under the LHOP program. Pusey explained that the developer and LHOP each contributed funds for the program; however, LHOP expended its allocation before 6 units could be sold under the program.

The Township Manager stated that the Warwick Township Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at three separate meetings and provided several recommendations for consideration by the Board. He explained that the project provides several access points as part of the development to reduce the amount of traffic on East Newport Road. He explained that based on the traffic study that was initially performed for the development, the developer constructed North Oak Street from East Newport Road to Lititz Borough and contributed toward improvement costs for Oak Street within the Borough to SR 772. The developer contributed toward the costs of the traffic signal at Clay Road and East Newport Road and installed the traffic signal at North Oak Street and East Newport Road. In addition, the developer widened and installed turning lanes and deceleration lanes on East Newport Road along the frontage of the site, and contributed toward the costs of the center turn lane from Orchard Road to Brunnerville Road. He explained that the developer contributed toward safety issues to mitigate the impact of the development, and added that the Township could only enforce State laws that require a developer to perform improvements that front along the project area. He noted that one of the requirements of the Conditional Use decision did require that traffic impacts should be re-evaluated upon the issuance of 200 certificates of occupancy.

The Township Manager explained that the Village Overlay zone provides for townhouse buildings of only 4 units; however, the development has been constructed with 5 contiguous townhouse units. He stated that the applicant will need a zoning variance in order to comply with their Revised Conditional Use Layout Plan. The Township Manager explained that the plan would be subject to review by the Municipal Authority in order to ensure that adequate water supply and sanitary sewage disposal can be provided to accommodate the increased number of dwelling units.

The Township Manager explained that the applicant provided a rendering of the parking spaces that are assigned to the proposed restaurant to provide overflow capability, if needed. The Township Manager outlined the recreational facilities that the developer has completed, or will contribute toward, as part of the project. He outlined the other issues contained within the Township Engineer’s March 26, 2003 comment letter. He also outlined the recommendations provided by the Planning Commission. He stated that the Commission recommended that the applicant develop a market strategy for the commercial area that will remain if the modification request is approved. The Commission also recommended that the applicant consider providing 2 of the proposed 10 townhouse units under the LHOP program. The Township Manager noted that the developer provided 5 of the original recommended 6 townhouse units under the LHOP program and added that the any consideration of the recommendation could be addressed in the decision by making the requirement based on the LHOP’s availability of funds. The Planning Commission also recommended that the applicant commit to a streetscape along East Newport Road since the plan proposes a significant streetscape along North Oak Street. He noted that the developer has submitted a rendering of the streetscape along East Newport Road. The Township Manager suggested that the Board stipulate a time frame for the completion of the proposed modifications. He noted that the existing barn on the property is a registered historic site and added that the developer has indicated that he will preserve and maintain the structure and has contacted Lancaster County’s historic specialist to ensure the design of the restaurant maintains the historic nature of the building. Glass stated that the streetscape along North Oak Street is nearing completion. He outlined the remaining items that need to be completed along the roadway.

The Chairman opened the meeting to public comment. He noted that the comments made during the guest recognition period of tonight’s meeting are not technically part of the public hearing for the Conditional Use application.

Mark Leister, 1201 E. Newport Road, was sworn in. Leister stated that he was not aware that retail commercial area was being eliminated as part of the project, and explained that the public hearing advertisement appeared to indicate that the proposal was simply to increase residential housing. He expressed concern over the excessive speed of motorists along East Newport Road. Bucher stated that Leister’s concerns are understood and added that the Board will review the speed issues along the roadway.

H. Robert Miller, 1203 E. Newport Road, was sworn in. Miller concurred that he also was not aware that retail commercial area was being eliminated as part of the project. He stated that the Township is also proposing to widen East Newport Road along the frontage of his property. The Township Manager explained that the roadway is narrow at this area and added that the Township attempts to provide 11' wide travel lanes with 2' wide shoulders wherever possible to increase safety along the roadways within the Township.

On a motion by Moyer, seconded by Vigunas, the Board voted unanimously to close the Conditional Use hearing for Newport Square Associates and to direct the Township Manager to enter all of the items presented during the public hearing to be part of the record for the public hearing.

COMMUNICATIONS: The Board received a copy of letter from the Lititz Public Library expressing appreciation to Township staff for maintaining their grounds each year (snow removal, lawn maintenance).

The Board received an invitation to attend an exhibit reception about the history of the Strasburg Railroad. The reception will be held on April 25, 2003 from 7:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.

CONSIDER THE SECHAN ELECTRONICS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN, PREPARED BY DIEHM & SONS, DATED 1/31/03: Kevin Varner, representing Diehm & Sons, stated that the site contains 8 acres of I-1 Industrial zoned lands located on the east side of Route 501 behind the Hess’ gas station. He explained that the plan proposes an additional parking area and the creation of 38 parking spaces. He noted that the additional parking is needed for employees only and not for any expansion of the operation. He added that five other parking spaces would be removed as part of the project in order to accommodate truck movement around the building. Varner explained that a portion of the proposed parking area would be located within the 100-year floodplain. He explained that the Zoning Hearing Board granted a Special Exception to allow the expansion of the parking lot in a flood plain zone at their January 8, 2003 meeting. Varner added that the height of the flood plain zone would not be altered as part of the proposal.

Varner stated that the proposed stormwater facilities would be located outside of the floodplain area. The facilities include a roof leader that would convey water to a large pipe that will replace a smaller pipe, and discharge to an outlet structure. The plan proposes a 50' wide riparian buffer easement along the Santo Domingo creek that flows along the southern border. The plan proposes the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) as part of the stormwater management facility. The Township Manager stated that the plan proposes reforestation within the riparian buffer on the site which would be coordinated through the Lititz Run Watershed Alliance. Tim Eberly detailed the type of work performed by Sechan Electronics.

The applicant is requesting a Waiver of Section 301 pertaining to plan processing requirements. The applicant’s consultant has requested a Waiver of the requirement to submit a "formal" Land Development Plan for the project. A "Storm Water Management Plan" has been submitted for review and consideration as a substitute for the formal Land Development Plan. The Township Engineer commented that although by literal interpretation of the Ordinance requirements, the proposed parking lot is clearly a Land Development Plan. However, since the project is relatively minor in nature but does contain storm water management improvements, they can support the Waiver request conditional on the submitted plan being processed as a Storm Water Management Plan. On a motion by Moyer, seconded by Myers, the Board unanimously approved a Waiver of Section 301 as requested. On a motion McSparran, seconded by Vigunas, the Board unanimously approved the Sechan Electronics Stormwater Management Plan contingent upon receipt of an acceptable Letter of Credit, upon recording of a Stormwater Mangement Agreement, and upon the applicant scheduling a preconstruction meeting with Township staff.

CONSIDER REQUEST FOR A 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO RECORD THE CORNERSTONE FAMILY HEALTH ASSOCIATES PLAN: The Board reviewed the request. On a motion by Myers, seconded by Vigunas, the Board unanimously approved the request for a 30-day extension of time to record the Cornerstone Family Health Associates Plan.

CONSIDER ORDINANCE #203 TO AMEND THE POLICE PENSION PLAN TO IMPLEMENT CHANGES TO THE PLAN AS SET FORTH IN THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002: The Board reviewed the Ordinance. The Township Manager explained that the changes address the Act 30 modifications to the Police Pension Plan which were mandated by the State. On a motion by Moyer, seconded by Myers, the Board voted unanimously to adopt Ordinance #203 to amend the Police Pension Plan.

DISCUSS ALIGNMENT OF HILLCREST AVENUE AND WEST WOODS DRIVE: The Township Manager explained that the item is being discussed based on discussions with a property owner in this area who plans on developing their land. He stated that the property owner did submit a rendering of proposed modifications to the roadways; however, upon review of the rendering, Township staff has provided an alternate rendering of potential roadway extensions in this area. The rendering illustrates the potential extension of Tupelo Street to Woodcrest Avenue and the realignment of Springview Drive to West Woods Drive which would create an intersection with a roadway along the Buckwalter tract. He noted that the rendering would eliminate Hillcrest Avenue. The Board briefly discussed the proposed roadway modifications.

CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A POLICE DEPARTMENT HIRING POLICY: The Township Manager requested that the item be tabled since the final review of the document has not been completed by the consultant. He noted that the policy is being drafted in accordance with the State model Police Department hiring policy.

CONSIDER REQUEST BY CUB SCOUT PACK 44 TO HOLD A FISHING DERBY ON MAY 3, 2003 AT THE RIPARIAN PARK: The Board reviewed the request. On a motion by Myers, seconded by Moyer, the Board unanimously approved the request by Cub Scout Pack 44 to hold a fishing derby on May 3, 2003 at the Riparian Park contingent upon submittal of a Certificate of Insurance naming Warwick Township as an additional insured on the day of the event, and upon the event being coordinated with the fire police.

CONSIDER PLEDGE BY PFIZER GLOBAL MANUFACTURING FOR CONTRIBUTION TO THE JOHN BONFIELD RECREATION FIELD PROJECT: A representative of Pfizer issued a letter to the Township indicating that due to their plant expansion and upgrade, it has become necessary for them to reallocate the usage of their ball fields on the site to the support of their manufacturing operations at the plant. Pfizer had provided these fields to the community to enable various organizations to undertake sporting activities. To help ensure that the community has the facilities to support the local sporting associations, the Pfizer Manufacturing plant has offered $30,000.00 to Warwick Township towards the construction of new athletic fields adjacent to the Bonfield Elementary School. The Township Manager stated that the Recreation Advisory Committee reviewed and accepted the proposal. The Board commended Pfizer for their dedication to the community.

CONSIDER RESOLUTION #04-02-03-01 AUTHORIZING TRAFFIC SIGNAL APPLICATION FOR WOODCREST AVENUE AND MILLPORT ROAD: The Board reviewed the resolution. The Township Manager explained that the traffic signal is part of the Lancaster HMA (Community Hospital) project. On a motion by Moyer, seconded by Vigunas, the Board unanimously accepted Resolution #04-02-03-01 to authorize the traffic signal application for Woodcrest Avenue and Millport Road.

CONSIDER REQUEST BY PFIZER TO CONDUCT THE 9^TH ANNUAL FRESHBURST 5 MILE RUN ON JULY 19, 2003:

The Board reviewed the request. On a motion by Moyer, seconded by Myers, the Board unanimously approved the request by Pfizer to conduct the 9^th Annual Freshburst 5 mile run on July 19, 2003, contingent upon submittal of a Certificate of Insurance naming Warwick Township as an additional insured on the day of the event, and upon the event being coordinated with the fire police.

CONSIDER REQUEST BY D & E COMMUNICATIONS FOR AN EQUIPMENT SHED EASEMENT AT THE LIONS PARK: The Board reviewed the request. The Township Manager explained that D & E Communications has an existing equipment shed at the park and is requesting authorization to remove the shed and construct a new shed at a different location within the park. He provided the proposed layout for the benefit of the Board. The Recreation Advisory Committee reviewed the proposal and is agreeable to the request with the following recommendations: The lease period be for 29 years instead of 99 years; the legal review of the agreement should be paid by the applicant; the layout for the future parking area within the park should be preserved; the existing equipment shed should be removed and the area restored, the security lighting does not glare on adjacent properties; and that the site be landscaped to provide a buffer to the adjacent property. Bucher recommended that a condition be added requiring that D & E Communications representatives park in the Lions Park parking lot to access the equipment shed. On a motion by Myers, seconded by McSparran, the Board unanimously approved the request by D & E Communications to relocate their equipment shed at the Lions Park contingent upon the 7 conditions as discussed.

DISCUSS POLICY ON A SINKHOLE REMEDIATION POLICY: The Township Manager recommended that the issue be tabled at this time since Township staff is finalizing several remediation issues.

OTHER BUSINESS TO COME BOFORE THE BOARD: The Township Manager explained that the public hearing for the Cable Franchise Agreement was held at the Ephrata Township building. He added that no members of the general public were present at the meeting. He noted that an agreement is currently being drafted by the consultant.

The Township Manager requested authorization to release the bids for paving materials. On a motion by Moyer, seconded by Myers, the Board unanimously authorized to release the bids for paving materials.

The Township Manager requested authorization to release the bids for the traffic signal at Wynfield Drive and SR501. On a motion by Myers, seconded by Moyer, the Board unanimously authorized to release the bids for the traffic signal at Wynfield Drive and SR501.

The Township Manager stated that the Board had discussed submitting an application to the County’s transportation grant program for the SR772 corridor. He explained that the Township Engineer recently completed a traffic study which supports the previously discussed improvements at the White Swan intersection and at Rothsville Road. He added that the traffic study also indicates that a traffic signal at the intersection of SR772 and Church Street is warranted. He noted that if a traffic signal is installed at this location, it would be looped with the other two traffic signals. He explained that the grant would fund 50% of the budgeted costs for the improvements, and stated that the Township could fund the remaining portion of the project with roadway improvement funds which are deposited by developers. He noted that the improvements would not occur until 2004. On a motion by McSparran, seconded by Myers, the Board voted unanimously to authorize the Township Manager to execute the Transportation Grant Application for the revised SR772 study.

ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Daniel L. Zimmerman
Township Manager