Chairman Thomas Zug convened the May 22, 2002 meeting of Warwick Township Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. Present were Commissioners Thomas Zug, Jane Boyce, John Gazsi, Kelly Gutshall, Daniel Garret, Brian Slinskey, and alternate Craig Kimmel. John Hohman was absent. In attendance were Township Manager Daniel Zimmerman, Mike Skelly, Cletus Bucher, Barbara Bucher, Keith Montgomery, Bena Montgomery, Lester Guyton, John Love, Randy Holly, Kerry Blind, Tom Matteson, Dan McGraw, Greg Hirtzel, Scott Campbell, Joel Snyder, Ruth Devenney, Michael Arno, J. Dwight Yoder, Bill Swiernik, Stan Skiba, Diane Bomberger, and Jonathan Byler.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Planning Commission unanimously approved the minutes of the April 24, 2002 meeting as submitted.

CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR HMA/COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, PREPARED BY RETTEW ASSOCIATES, DATED 3/8/02: John Love, representing Rettew Associates, explained that the developer and their representatives met with Township staff to review and discuss the Township Engineer's May 13, 2002 comment letter on May 21, 2002. The Township Manager stated that some of the items contained within the May 13, 2002 comment letter would be addressed as part of the Final Plan for the project. He explained that the items that should be addressed specifically as part of the Preliminary Plan for the project were discussed at the May 21, 2002 meeting.

The Applicant is requesting a Waiver of Section 224.6 (Storm Water Management Ordinance) which requires 1' of cover from the crown of storm pipes to subgrade. The applicant has requested relief from the requirement to install all drainage pipes with a minimum of 1' of cover for those pipes between I-77 to I-76, I-78 to EW-1 and I-78 to I-75 due to existing site constraints. The pipes will be installed as reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). The Township Engineer commented that based on their review, they offer the following recommendations: a) I-78 to EW-1: Since a minimum of 1' of cover is provided from the top of the pipe to the finished pavement (compared to the requirement of 1' to subgrade), the location of EW-1 was adjusted to enable the perpendicular crossing of Highlands Drive and since Class IV, RCP pipe will be installed as indicated, they would support the Waiver; b.) I-78 to I-75: Since a minimum of 1' of cover is provided from the top of the pipe to the finished pavement, the location of inlet I-75 was adjusted so the two pipes from I-78 can be installed parallel to one another and since Class IV, RCP pipe will be installed as indicated, they would support the Waiver. On a motion by Garrett, seconded by Boyce, the Planning Commission unanimously recommends granting approval of the Waiver request contingent upon the Township Engineer's comments being addressed.

The Applicant is requesting a Waiver of Section 225.5 (Storm Water Management Ordinance) which requires basins to drain within 24 hours. The proposed Basin 3 will drain in an indicated 3.8 days from the completely full condition based on the inherent nature of the storm water management design and the inclusion of Best Management Practices (BMPs). The Township Engineer commented that since this is a private facility which will be staffed 24-hours a day, and considering the conflict between the storm water management vs. the BMP design philosophies, they have no objections to granting the Waiver for this project. The Commission requested clarification on the storm water facilities on the site. Love explained that where possible, the proposed islands would allow storm water to sheet flow and be collected via sand/soil swales that will filter the water and discharge it into shallow marshes. Subsequently, the marshes would drain into the wet pond on the low end of the property and ultimately into the existing detention basin across the road from this site. He explained that the Waiver of vertical curb is being requested as a result of this storm water management design. The Commission inquired what is the maximum depth of the wet pond. Love responded that the wet pond would have an approximate depth of 6' with approximately 2' of storage above the 6' depth. He added that the pond has a water surface elevation that is approximately 2' below the spillway, and another 2' above the spillway with a 5:1 side slope and a berm on the lower portion of the site. Love detailed the design of the basin and swales for the benefit of the Commission.

Love explained that the swales and basin would be Clay lined, and the perforated pipes and a sand/soil mixture would be placed on the clay. He noted that the wet pond would be fed by a well when needed to ensure a specific water level is maintained within the basin. On a motion by Garrett, seconded by Kimmel, the Planning Commission unanimously recommends granting approval of the Waiver request contingent upon the Township Engineer's comments being addressed.

The Applicant is requesting a Waiver of Section 603.3.B (Subdivision & Land Development Ordinance) pertaining to vertical concrete curb. This Waiver is a two-part request. First, as stated in the request letter it is being requested to eliminate the construction of vertical concrete curb in those sections of the parking areas where runoff will sheet flow into the Bio-Retention Swales. The Township Engineer commented that for the reasons stated and since precast concrete curb stops (or wheel stops) have been shown in those areas where the curb is being eliminated, they have no objections to granting the Waiver. Second, it is the desire of the applicant to install vertical concrete curb with a reveal of 6" compared to the requirement of 8" of reveal. The Township Engineer commented that considering the use of the site and for the justifications cited, they have no objections to granting the Waiver for the curb constructed solely within the site. They noted that all other curb along the Township roads should be constructed with the 8" reveal. On a motion by Gazsi, seconded by Slinskey, the Planning Commission unanimously recommends granting approval of the Waiver request contingent upon the Township Engineer's comments being addressed.

The Applicant is requesting a Waiver of Section 225.7.A (Storm Water Management Ordinance) which states that the maximum (basin) depth shall not exceed 6'. The Township Engineer commented that based on the inherent design of the storm water management retention/detention facility (Basin 3) with a permanent body of water, the maximum permitted depth of 6' is exceeded. The Township Engineer commented they have no objections to granting the Waiver for the reasons cited by the Applicant. On a motion by Garrett, seconded by Boyce, the Planning Commission unanimously recommends granting approval of the Waiver request contingent upon the Township Engineer's comments being addressed.

Love addressed the Township Engineer's May 13, 2002 comment letter. He described the proposed public water and sewer connections to the Municipal Authority's service facilities for the benefit of the Commission. Love explained that the proposed Emergency Access Drive would be designed with grass pavers and a maximum depressed curb section of 24'. He noted that the access drive was originally designed with a 40' long section of depressed curb; however, the Township Engineer recommended limiting the depressed curb at the entrance to a distance of 24'. He explained that a separate set of roadway improvement plans have been submitted for this project and added that the general dimensions for these improvements will be noted on the Final Plan. Love explained that the Applicant has discussed the various traffic review and roadway improvement items identified in the Township Engineer's comment letter with either PennDOT or Township staff. The Township Manager noted that the proposed roadway improvements have also been discussed with Lancaster Airport Authority representatives and also representatives of Manheim Township. Love noted that the Applicant will submit a plan to the Township that outlines the proposed signage for the site. The Commission inquired who would own the land where the hospital would be located. Attorney Mark Stanley, representing the Applicant, stated that he anticipates the finalization of the deed transfer from the current property owner to Lancaster HMA between June and August, 2002.

The Township Manager explained that the Applicant is requesting conditional approval of the Preliminary Plan in order to begin the site work during the summer. The on-site work would be limited to site preparation, sedimentation and erosion control measures, and storm water management facilities. Rough grading for the parking areas and the building pad would also take place during this time. The Township Manager stated that the Applicant has submitted a construction sequence for the first 90 days of on-site work for the benefit of the Commission. He added that the Township will hold monthly construction progress meetings with the Applicant following the start of the on-site work. On a motion by Garrett, seconded by Boyce, the Commission unanimously recommends conditional approval of the Preliminary Plan contingent upon the Township Engineer's comments being addressed and upon Township staff's comments being addressed. On a motion by Boyce, seconded by Gazsi, the Commission unanimously recommends approval of the Improvement Construction Plan, contingent upon execution of the Agreement that directs and outlines the Construction Improvement Plan, that the activities included on the construction plan be restricted to site preparation, sedimentation and erosion control measures, storm water management facilities, and rough grading for the parking areas and the building pad, upon monthly construction progress meetings be held with Township staff in addition to the regular construction inspections by the Township Engineer, and upon an Escrow account being established for the applicable construction inspection expenses.

Love explained that the only other Waiver that the Applicant would need is for the Sewer Module approval for the Construction Improvement Plan. He noted that an approved Sewer Module would be required prior to Final Plan approval for the project. On a motion by Garrett, seconded by Gazsi, the Commission unanimously recommends approval of a Waiver of the Sewer Module approval requirement for the Construction Improvement Plan, contingent upon the Sewer Module being approved prior to Final Plan approval by the Township.

CONSIDER THE FINAL LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR WENDY'S, INC., PREPARED BY RETTEW ASSOCIATES, DATED 4/10/02: Tom Matteson, representing Rettew Associates, explained that the Applicant is proposing to construct a Wendy's fast food restaurant on Lot 4 of the Buckhill Farm Plan. The lot contains approximately 2.7 acres of Community Commercial zoned land. Matteson stated that the site would be accessed via Peters Road. The proposal is to construct an approximate 2,928 square foot building with a drive-through and 50 parking spaces, and to extend Access Drive "B" into the new Wendy's parking lot. Matteson explained that concrete sidewalk will be constructed at the front of the site along Peters Road and extending around the radius to Access Drive B. He noted that crosswalks would be provided on Peters Road from the existing pads for the bus shelters to this site. The Township Manager explained that sidewalk would be extended from the proposed Lancaster General Hospital site adjacent to the Shopping Center to Highlands Drive. The Commission suggested that the applicant consider extending sidewalk from Peters Road through the Wendy's site along the access drive to eliminate pedestrian traffic on the access drive. Matteson stated that the Applicant has requested consideration that the southern access from Access Drive B be designated as an exit only. He explained that the design for Access Drive B would accommodate two-way traffic to Stauffers of Kissel Hill if needed in the future; however, the access point from Wendy's would only provide for one-way traffic. He noted that appropriate signage would be installed if the request were approved.

The Applicant is requesting a Waiver of Section 301.3 pertaining to Preliminary Plan application. The Applicant has requested a Waiver of the requirement to provide a Preliminary Plan, instead providing the Preliminary/Final Plan as submitted. The Applicant indicated in the request letter that the project is rather small in nature and the subject lot was created as part of the previously approved Preliminary and Final Subdivision/Land Development Plans for the Shoppes at Kissel Village project. The Township Engineer commented that since the lot was part of the previous plans in which traffic, sewer/water service and storm water management was addressed; it is their opinion that providing two separate plan submissions for the development of this lot would provide no benefit to either the Township or the Applicant. Therefore, they have no objections to granting the Waiver for this project. On a motion by Kimmel, seconded by Garrett, the Commission unanimously recommends approval of the Waiver request. The Township Manager inquired whether or not the Commission would like the Applicant to provide sidewalk along the access drive extending from Peters Road. The Commission members indicated that they would like the sidewalk extended along the access drive from Peters Road. The Commission inquired whether or not the sign regulations would restrict temporary signage from the windows of the restaurant. The Township Manager explained that the Conditional Use approval did not specifically address the issue. Matteson stated that the proposed pylon signage for Wendy's includes an area where removable letters could be placed to advertise specials. On a motion by Boyce, seconded by Gutshall, the Commission recommends approval of the Final Land Development Plan for Wendy's contingent upon the Township Engineer's May 15, 2002 comment letter being addressed, and upon the extension of the additional sidewalk from Peters Road along the access drive as discussed this evening.

CONSIDER THE FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAN FOR JONATHAN BYLER, PREPARED BY RGS ASSOCIATES, DATED 4/24/02: Joel Snyder, representing RGS Associates, explained that the site contains approximately 11 acres of R-1 zoned lands located along Rudy Dam Road and adjoining the Windsor Pointe Development. He stated the plan proposes 7 single-family lots. The existing Windsor Lane roadway will be extended into this development. The roadway would be designed with a permanent cul-de-sac; however, curbing would not be extended around the bulb of the cul-de-sac in order to provide for the extension of the roadway in the future, if needed. Snyder stated that the plan does not provide for direct access to Rudy Dam Road by any of the proposed lots. He noted that steep slope easements have been designated on lot 6 and lot 7 of the plan and added that Byler intends to retain ownership of lot 6 to build his home. Snyder addressed the Township Engineer's May 15, 2002 comment letter. The Township Manager explained that the plan illustrates a proposed 50' right-of-way for the future extension of the Dogwood Valley roadway. He added that the future extension would have to cross lands that are not owned by the developer of this tract. He explained that the adjoining lands contain steep slopes and wetlands which could adversely affect the ability to extend Windsor Lane to these areas in the future; however, a potential roadway layout has been illustrated on the plan for future evaluation purposes.

The Applicant is requesting a Waiver of Section 603.2.B.1 pertaining to sidewalks. The Applicant has requested a Waiver of the requirement to construct sidewalk along the north side of Windsor Lane in accordance with the Township Engineer's recommendation. This is based on the condition that a similar Waiver was granted for the original Windsor Pointe. The Township Engineer commented that they recommend approval of the Waiver request. On a motion by Garrett, seconded by Slinskey, the Commission unanimously recommends approval of the Waiver request. On a motion by Slinskey, seconded by Gazsi, the Commission unanimously recommends approval of the Jonathan Byler Final Plan contingent upon the Township Engineer's May 15, 2002 comment letter being addressed.

CONSIDER THE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION FOR DOGWOOD VALLEY, PHASE III, PREPARED BY DAVID MILLER/ASSOCIATES: Attorney Dwight Yoder, of Gibbel, Kraybill & Hess, stated the he is present this evening to represent the Applicant. Attorney Yoder explained that the Township approved the Conditional Use decision for the entire Dogwood Valley project on November 2, 1994. He explained that Dogwood Valley, Phase I and Dogwood Valley, Phase II subsequently received Final Plan approval and a majority of the construction within each phase has been completed. He explained that prior to this submittal for Phase III of the project, the Conditional Use decision for the project expired. He explained that typically, an Applicant could request an extension of time for the Conditional Use decision; however, since the Applicant did not request an extension of time prior to the expiration of the decision, the Board is not empowered to act on such a request. He stated that since the Applicant is unable to request an extension of time on the previous Conditional Use approval, they are submitting a separate Conditional Use application for Dogwood Valley, Phase III. He noted that the Township approved several amendments to its Zoning Ordinance after the date of the original Conditional Use decision, and since the decision expired prior to submittal of Phase III, the plan has been modified from its original design to address the Zoning Ordinance amendments.

Bill Swiernik, representing David Miller/Associates, stated that the Conditional Use Application is being submitted under Section 204.4.A of the Zoning Ordinance to allow a Cluster Development in the R-1 zoning district. He explained that the plan proposes the extension of the existing Dogwood Valley roadway. He stated that the roadway would be extended from the existing temporary cul-de-sac through a low area where a culvert would be installed, and terminating in a temporary cul-de-sac that would serve 8 single-family lots. He noted that the design would match the character of the other properties within the development. He explained that the Applicant has obtained the necessary stream encroachment permit and wetland mitigation approval that were required to extend the roadway. He explained that this phase of the development contains approximately 8.75 acres which includes 2.1 acres of open space. Swiernik addressed the criteria under Section 414 of the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to cluster developments within the R-1 zoning district. He explained that the lots would be served with public sewer and public water. He stated that the temporary cul-de-sac has been designed with a 40' radius and provisions for the future extension of the roadway to the adjacent property if needed in the future. He added that the culvert has been designed to adequately convey storm water from a 100-year storm event. He stated that if the Commission is favorable to the application, they would request an extension of time to obtain the necessary building permits.

Swiernik addressed the Township Engineer's May 15, 2002 comment letter. He stated that the Dogwood Valley roadway would have a maximum slope of 10%. Gutshall inquired whether or not the wetland mitigation would occur on-site. Swiernik responded in the affirmative. The Township Manager stated that during the previous review of the project, the Commission expressed concern over the design of the proposed embankment wall and had requested certification of the integrity of the wall. Swiernik stated that they are still working on the design of the embankment wall. The Commission inquired whether or not the trail will cross the existing wetlands since this area tends to stay wet. Swiernik stated that the location of the trail may need to be modified in order to avoid a wet condition and to continue the trail extension. The Township Manager explained that the sidewalk would be installed on the north side of the proposed roadway at the request of the Commission; however, the existing sidewalk within the development is on the south side of the roadway which will require a mid-block cross condition. The request was made to avoid sidewalk at the location of the horizontal and vertical curve of the roadway. The Chairman inquired where the mid-block crossing would occur. Swiernik stated that the crossing would occur at the phasing line between Phase II and Phase III of the development. On a motion by Boyce, seconded by Garrett, the Commission unanimously recommends approval of the Conditional Use Application for Dogwood Valley, Phase III.

REVIEW SKETCH PLAN FOR MODIFICATION OF NEWPORT SQUARE - PHASE III: David Pusey, representing Pusey & Raffensperger Builders, stated that he is one of the owners of the townhouse portion of the Newport Square development. He explained that the specific area where the modification is being requested is currently designed for 5 single-family homes. The location is directly across Balmer Road from several of the townhouse lots. He stated that they would like consideration to modify the 5 single-family lots to create 10 townhouse lots. Pusey explained that the plan was originally approved with the single-family lot design because this area abuts an area of single-family homes within Lititz Borough. He noted that due to the location of the existing detention basin and power lines, these homes do not directly abut any single family lots within Lititz Borough. He explained that the rear of the lots are approximately 100' from the properties within Lititz Borough. Pusey stated that they have not performed any engineering design to support the proposal at this time, in order to obtain the Warwick Township Planning Commission's input on the proposal. He expressed the opinion that the proposal would not adversely affect the single-family lots within Lititz Borough. He stated that the townhouse design will provide for garages to be constructed to the rear of the townhouse units. He addressed the Township Engineer's May 15, 2002 comment letter. He stated that the proposal includes the construction of an alley at the rear of the lots that would provide access through the parking lot for the commercial area. He noted that the developer (Michael Glass) is agreeable to this proposal. He added that the front of the townhouse units would access Balmer Road. He explained that the parking lot design for the commercial area may need to be modified slightly to accommodate the proposal. Pusey stated that the Municipal Authority has indicated that they would have the available capacity to serve 5 additional homes in this area. The Township Manager stated that additional parking would need to be addressed as part of the project. He noted that parking is restricted on one side of Balmer Road. Pusey stated that two parking spaces would be provided to the rear of the lots in addition to the garage. Pusey stated that the provision would also provide additional homes as part of LHOP and noted that they recently sold one of their homes under LHOP. The Township Manager explained that any change to the Newport Square plan would require modification of the original Conditional Use application. Pusey stated that he is aware of the requirement. Gazsi inquired whether a buffer area could be created between the existing single-family homes in Lititz Borough and the proposed townhouse units. Pusey stated that he would need to discuss the issue with the developer since the buffer would need to be provided on the developer's property. He explained that the proposal is being requested for economic reasons, noting that he could sell townhouses abutting a power line easier than single-family homes abutting a power line due to the cost differential. The Township Manager inquired whether or not the number of proposed townhouse lots could be reduced. Pusey responded that he is paying the same amount for the property whether he constructs single-family homes or townhouses; therefore, he would need approval to create at least 9 townhouse lots in order to make the project economically feasible. The Township Manager stated that consideration should be given to providing additional parking to serve these lots; also, consideration should be given to extending the access from Chickadee Drive to Balmer Road rather than through the commercial parking area in order to avoid potential traffic conflicts. Pusey stated that he will review the issue as part of the engineering design for the proposal. Boyce stated that she cannot support the proposed change to the density since the Commission discussed the transition between the single-family homes and townhouses at length when the plan was originally submitted. The Township Manager stated that additional parking and the alley access would need to be adequately addressed as part of any modification to the proposal. Garrett stated that the Township has not received any complaints regarding the development, to date, and if the engineering issues can be addressed, he could support the proposed modification. Zug concurred and stated that Pusey could at least pursue the proposal noting that several items would have to be addressed with any submittal for modification.

REVIEW WAIVER REQUEST BY CLETUS BUCHER, PREPARED BY DIEHM & SONS, DATED 5/9/02: Cletus Bucher explained that he would like to subdivide his existing property to create a building lot that he would convey to his daughter. He is requesting a Waiver of Section 610.2.B which requires the extension of the public water system when a new dwelling unit is constructed within 1,000' of an existing public water main. The Township Manager explained that the Municipal Authority has a pressurized system in this area of the Township. He stated that a water booster station was constructed along Newport Road that provides service to this area and added that the Municipal Authority could provide capacity to this property. He explained that the area that is the subject to this request was a single lot at one time; however, a lot add-on plan was approved for the previous property owners (Bucher's parents) in 1981. He noted that this property owner was not aware of the lot add-on plan until he reviewed the possibility of allowing his daughter to build on the lot. The Township Manager stated that proposal would require zoning approval if the lot is not served by public water (the lot would be served by public sewer) since it would not have the required minimum lot size of 1 acre (the minimum lot size if served by both public sewer and public water is 15,000 square feet.). Bucher explained that none of the other lots within this portion of the Hilltop Manor development are served by public water.

Garrett explained that he would be agreeable to granting the Waiver request if an aquifer test is conducted that verifies that this proposal would not have any adverse impacts to the existing wells in the surrounding area. The Township Manager concurred and stated that since this area is served by a pressurized system, he could support the proposal provided that an aquifer test is conducted that verifies that a sustainable yield well could be supported for this property. He noted that he does not wish to set a precedence if this proposal is approved without the requirement to extend public water to serve the lot. On a motion by Garrett, seconded by Slinskey, the Commission unanimously recommends approval of the Waiver request contingent upon the Township Engineer's May 15, 2002 comment letter being addressed, and that all appropriate aquifer test results meet the satisfaction of the Township. The Commission noted that this recommendation is based on the stipulation that a pressurized water system serves this area of the Township.

GUEST RECOGNITION: Greg Hirtzel, 195 West Millport Road, stated that he lives near the intersection of West Millport Road and Woodcrest Avenue and he is concerned about the adverse impact that the proposed Community Hospital project could have on traffic at this intersection. He explained that numerous children live in this area he would like the Township to consider installing "Children at Play" signs along West Millport Road and that the Township also consider lowering the speed limit from 40 mph to 30 mph along the roadway. The Township Manager stated that the Township must perform a traffic study in order to support the request for a reduced speed limit along any roadway. He explained that the Township performed a traffic study along West Millport Road in 1999 to reduce the speed limit from the "unposted" speed limit of 55 mph to 40 mph. He explained that a roadway must meet specific standards to qualify for a speed limit reduction. Hirtzel stated that he is aware that a traffic signal could eventually be installed at the intersection of Woodcrest Avenue and West Millport Road and suggested that the Township consider a three-way stop instead of the traffic signal since it could have less impact on the existing properties in this area (due to potential traffic back-ups at a traffic signal). He inquired whether any additional improvements will be conducted at the intersection. The Township Manager explained that Woodcrest Avenue is a State-owned roadway so any intersection improvements would need to be coordinated with their office. He noted that improvement plans are currently being designed for this intersection which would have to meet PennDOT standards for a Highway Occupancy Permit. The Township Manager explained that he will advise the engineer of the project (Rettew Associates) to provide any intersection improvement plans to Hirtzel for his information. The Township Manager detailed the process that would be followed for any potential improvements to the intersection of West Millport Road and Woodcrest Avenue.

The Township Manager explained that the cost of "Children at Play" signs is usually paid by the individual requesting installation of the sign. He recommended that Hirtzel submit his request to include this signage as part of the roadway improvements for the Community Hospital project, and the Board will consider the request at a future meeting.

REVIEW MODIFICATION OF NEWPORT SQUARE, PHASE II: Joel Snyder, representing RGS Associates, explained that the requested modification is in response to a concern raised by the fire companies regarding Newport Square, Phase II. He explained that the apartment buildings within Phase II are currently under construction and the concern within this phase relates to the design of the parking lots for the apartment buildings. He stated that the parking lot layout was designed to reduce the potential for motorists to speed through these areas and added that the location of the car ports within the parking lots also took this potential into consideration. He explained that the proposed location of the car ports would hinder the movement of ladder trucks at the rear of the apartment buildings and the fire company representatives requested a modification to this design. Snyder explained that the proposal this evening is to modify the design of the car ports in order to facilitate the movement of large emergency equipment within the parking lots if needed. He explained that the crosswalks in this area would be highlighted to emphasize these areas for motorists. The Township Manager explained that the proposed design is to eliminate the partitions within the car ports and to install garage doors and painted parking spaces. He noted that Township's original concern with garage units in this development was that they would be used for storage and not for parking. This design would reduce the issue of storage if the partitions are removed. The Township Manager explained that the each of the proposed car ports within the development would follow the same design. Snyder explained that 12 parking spaces in this area would need to be eliminated to accommodate the proposal and added that the project still exceeds the number of parking spaces as required by the Ordinance. The Commission voted 5-2 to support the proposed modification of the car ports by eliminating the partitions and installing garage doors as requested by the Applicant.

CONSIDER FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR TRAIL LINK BETWEEN LITITZ AND EPHRATA: The Township Manager explained that the feasibility study would involve a rails-to-trails link from Ephrata Borough to Lititz Borough. The municipalities involved would be Ephrata Borough, Ephrata Township, Akron Borough, Warwick Township and Lititz Borough. The Commission voted unanimously to support a feasibility study for the trail link between Ephrata Borough and Lititz Borough.

PROPOSED WATER LINE EXTENSION TO THE BRUNNERVILLE AREA: The Township Manager explained that as part of the John Beck Elementary School project, a 10" water line will be extended into the Brunnerville area to serve the school. He stated that the Township is requesting the Commission's support of an application for a Community Development Block Grant through the Lancaster County Redevelopment Authority to finance 85% of the cost to extend public water to serve the residents in the Brunnerville area. The Commission unanimously supports a Community Development Block Grant application for the Brunnerville water line extension project.

ADJOURNMENT: With no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 10:35 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Daniel L. Zimmerman
Township Manager